<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keyword Rich Domain Names &#8211; Does It Matter?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reubenrock.com/2009/01/keyword-rich-domain-names-does-it-matter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reubenrock.com/2009/01/keyword-rich-domain-names-does-it-matter/</link>
	<description>Internet Marketer, Graduate Student, Radical Dude.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 21:46:05 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Leo Dimilo</title>
		<link>http://reubenrock.com/2009/01/keyword-rich-domain-names-does-it-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo Dimilo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reubenrock.com/?p=101#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Hey Reuben,

I would love to read some of the other &quot;myths&quot; this guy professes about SEO.

The domain name, while not a slam dunk, is the first indicator of where Google should categorize your site.  While it isn&#039;t that huge of a ranking factor, it definitely isn&#039;t a non-factor.

Plus, the author forgets that most people don&#039;t/won&#039;t anchor text correctly.  Instead they will drop the URL....guess what?....yeah, the keyword is in the URL and perfect for &quot;SEO&quot; purposes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Reuben,</p>
<p>I would love to read some of the other &#8220;myths&#8221; this guy professes about SEO.</p>
<p>The domain name, while not a slam dunk, is the first indicator of where Google should categorize your site.  While it isn&#8217;t that huge of a ranking factor, it definitely isn&#8217;t a non-factor.</p>
<p>Plus, the author forgets that most people don&#8217;t/won&#8217;t anchor text correctly.  Instead they will drop the URL&#8230;.guess what?&#8230;.yeah, the keyword is in the URL and perfect for &#8220;SEO&#8221; purposes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
